拍品专文
Regarded since the eighteenth century as a work by Rembrandt, this painting was first reassigned to the master's school by A. Bredius (op. cit., 1969 p. 588). Similarly conceived three quarter length images of men in armor have been attributed to the talented Rembrandt pupil, Willem Drost, for example Man in Armor [Mars?], Gemäldegalerie, Kassel, Inv. no. 245, (W. Sumowski, Gemälde der Rembrandt-Schüler, I, 1983, no. 321). Compare also Drost's Man in Fanciful Constume with Beret formerly signed and dated 1654 (ex-collection Baron Alphonse du Rothschild; ibid., no. 331).
While he acknowledges smilarities with Drost's palette in the present lot, Werner Sumowski (in a letter dated August 6, 1996) also points to stylistic connections with the early work of Samuel van Hoogstraten (1627-1678) from the second half of the 1640s. He specifically compares Hoogstraten's Self Portrait of 16(4)4 in the Bredius Museum, The Hague, Inv. no. 56-1946 (ibid., II, no. 847, illustrated), in which the treatment of the sitter's cap is similar to that of the feathered helmet in the present painting. Although identified as a portrait of Marquis d'Andelot when exhibited in 1909 and when sold in 1928, the subject is unknown. As in Rembrandt's so-called Alexander the Great (versions in the Art Gallery and Museum, Glasgow and the Gulbenkian Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal) the armor and fancy costume evoke a figure from history or imagination.
While he acknowledges smilarities with Drost's palette in the present lot, Werner Sumowski (in a letter dated August 6, 1996) also points to stylistic connections with the early work of Samuel van Hoogstraten (1627-1678) from the second half of the 1640s. He specifically compares Hoogstraten's Self Portrait of 16(4)4 in the Bredius Museum, The Hague, Inv. no. 56-1946 (ibid., II, no. 847, illustrated), in which the treatment of the sitter's cap is similar to that of the feathered helmet in the present painting. Although identified as a portrait of Marquis d'Andelot when exhibited in 1909 and when sold in 1928, the subject is unknown. As in Rembrandt's so-called Alexander the Great (versions in the Art Gallery and Museum, Glasgow and the Gulbenkian Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal) the armor and fancy costume evoke a figure from history or imagination.